Fujitsu CELSIUS W410

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W410  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3062-A1
Memory10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '18 at 20:15
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 193
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 472
52% 412 Pts
64-Core 473
29% 473 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
MSI(1462 1601) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 6
Parallax 2.91
3% 4.29 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 4.74
3% 3.76 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 64GB-$92
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
45% Average
Read 484
Write 110
Mixed 176
56% 257 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 4.57
61% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.6
DQ Write 62.1
DQ Mixed 4.53
14% 30.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45%
Great: 65%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
507GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 92.1
Write 107
Mixed 103
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.34
99% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
289GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 92.6
Write 88.3
Mixed 87.1
67% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.47
114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. M378B5773CH0-CH9 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W410 Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback