Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Memory 74.3 1-Core 58.9 2-Core 125 52% 86.1 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 422 40% 331 Pts	64-Core 909 56% 909 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 61%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 235GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5564 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 667 (B1) Unknown 99 99 16 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 63 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 12 (F1) Unknown 99 99 19210196992	72.9% Very good	Read 500 Write 397 Mixed 409 97% 435 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 48.7 4K Mixed 15 84% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 81.9 DQ Mixed 14.6 32% 66.7 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 134%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB 33,521 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 11GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 5.94 Mixed 9.26 15% 15.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.25 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.83 96% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M39B2G73AH0-C 8x16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	66.5% Good	MC Read 29 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 24.3 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 5.8 20% 7.03 GB/s	Latency 91.8 44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 69%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16