Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory13.4 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110928
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '18 at 21:01
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B99
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 83.6
1-Core 47.9
2-Core 95.4
50% 75.6 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 177
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA41A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 102
Write 109
Mixed 106
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.36
90% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 76%
Kingston DT microDuo 3.0 16GB
3GB free, PID 16a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
6.35% Terrible
Read 26.1
Write 6.36
Mixed 9.29
14% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.46
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.05
20% 1.52 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.35%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 98 99U5471-052.A00LF ID:01 98 99U5471-052.A00LF 49GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
8192, 8192, 33792 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.9% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 11.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.3
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback