Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H61  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110913
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 27 '18 at 18:35
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 193
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 369
49% 368 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Gigabyte(1458 3505) 1GB
CLim: 730 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 5.35
Parallax 3.66
4% 4.49 fps
MRender 6.19
Gravity 4.53
Splatting 3.22
4% 4.65 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.6% Above average
Read 233
Write 189
Mixed 190
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 20.8
95% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 34.9
DQ Write 71.8
DQ Mixed 21.2
25% 42.6 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 124%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
458GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 63.2
Write 67.5
Mixed 11.1
34% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 0.12
4K Mixed 0.08
25% 0.18 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 63%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
417GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 136
Write 146
Mixed 87.3
92% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 2.93
4K Mixed 0.58
146% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team--Elite-1333 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.4
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 17.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61 Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61 - $77

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback