Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 0 930 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 75.7 1-Core 63.5 2-Core 126 54% 88.3 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 502 45% 378 Pts	64-Core 502 31% 502 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% PNY(196E 13A1) 2GB CLim: 1562 MHz, MLim: 1888 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Lighting 36.7 Reflection 33.9 Parallax 31.3 30% 34 fps	MRender 40.5 Gravity 32.3 Splatting 32.6 28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 10100 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 284 (B1) Unknown 98 98 31 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 51 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 87 (F1) Unknown 99 99 32951969030
Poor: 80% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron-002C 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6P1 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6P1 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6P1 32GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 13.1 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 5 20% 6.83 GB/s	Latency 88.9 45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 39%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 58%

Gunboat

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	99x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	82x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	64x

RAM
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	43x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	39x
M393B1G70BH0-YK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 67%, 378 samples	24x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $316