HP 810-010el

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 810-010el  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory16.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130919
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 01 '18 at 18:51
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 83.1
1-Core 121
2-Core 245
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 628
65% 524 Pts
64-Core 628
39% 628 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.2% Above average
Lighting 75
Reflection 74.7
Parallax 64.3
61% 71.3 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 66.9
Splatting 67.7
55% 67.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
594GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 134
Mixed 138
117% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.3
95% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 109%
Maxtor STM3500320AS 500GB
64GB free
Firmware: MX15 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 76.6
Write 92.9
Mixed 65.4
58% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.33
91% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Ultra 16GB
12GB free, PID 558a, San Disk Ultra USB
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 129
Write 35.7
Mixed 51.9
75% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.26
4K Write 2.42
4K Mixed 1.57
155% 3.08 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 0215 CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 Kingston HP698650-154-HYAG 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.6% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 15
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 17.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 810-010el Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP 810-010el

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $302
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback