Today's hottest deals

Asus N56VZ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus N56VZ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N56VZ
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121102
Uptime10.5 Days
Run DateMar 22 '16 at 18:10
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 150
67% 109 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 209
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M
Asus(1043 2103) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6200
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
7.53% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 8.15
Parallax 9.19
7% 8.75 fps
MRender 8.81
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 11.6
8% 9.61 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.53%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
874GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 95
Write 86.9
Mixed 86.9
68% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.31
86% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G3N169ES4.16FK 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 20.4
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 18.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N56VZ Builds (Compare 596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N56VZ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $500
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback