Samsung 550P5C/550P7C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 550P5C/550P7C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT550P5C-S66S
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130917
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJun 14 '18 at 17:13
Run Duration351 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 76.8
1-Core 71.6
2-Core 114
55% 87.6 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 160
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M
Sanyo(144D C0D1) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9731
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
7.72% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 8.12
Parallax 9.34
7% 8.79 fps
MRender 9.05
Gravity 10.6
Splatting 11.5
9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.72%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JF4OA0D0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 68.7
Write 77.1
Mixed 66.1
53% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.12
4K Write 0.95
4K Mixed 0.17
42% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 68%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
6.74% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 2.93
Mixed 5.67
9% 9.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.63
4K Write 0.66
4K Mixed 0.85
69% 2.05 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.74%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DM0-CK0 M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.2% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.8
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 9.7
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550P5C/550P7C Builds (Compare 607 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 550P5C/550P7C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback