Today's hottest deals

HP 500-205eo

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 500-205eo  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '18 at 22:18
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-670K (2013 D.Ri)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 136
59% 97.2 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 228
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Asus(1043 0429) 1GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.6.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Lighting 15.5
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 19.2
13% 17 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 18.8
13% 15.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 183
Mixed 170
138% 184 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.37
96% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Kingston KHX1600C9D3/2GX 6GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.4% Poor
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 9.8
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9.3
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-205eo Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-205eo

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 13% - Very poor Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback