Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory41.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151218
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateMar 28 '16 at 09:43
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 207
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 661
66% 536 Pts
64-Core 826
51% 826 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6451
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44% Average
Lighting 65.4
Reflection 33.4
Parallax 33.4
53% 44.1 fps
MRender 41.4
Gravity 29.9
Splatting 26.5
26% 32.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 469
Mixed 501
110% 493 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 36.9
128% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 132
138% 227 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
752GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 33.3
Write 232
Mixed 58.1
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.96
4K Write 5.38
4K Mixed 0.79
227% 2.38 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 184%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
1TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 87.6
Write 87
Mixed 60.3
98% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.23
75% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M4A2400C14 CMK16GX4M4A2400C14 CMK32GX4M4A2400C14 CMK16GX4M4A2400C14 CMK32GX4M4A2400C14 CMK16GX4M4A2400C14 CMK32GX4M4A2400C14 CMK16GX4M4A2400C14 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
102% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 43.1
MC Mixed 38.9
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 17.4
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 102%
This bench: 102%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,086 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $790
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback