User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemStandard AHV
MotherboardINTEL HURONRIVER
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110323
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 23 '18 at 02:41
Run Duration463 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 66.2
2-Core 110
55% 86.3 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 160
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Device(1297 2020) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2342
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
1.94% Terrible
Lighting 2.17
Reflection 3.27
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.31 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.17
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.94%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$68
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB4OC64G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 52.4
Write 36.4
Mixed 9.19
24% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.02
4K Write 0.05
4K Mixed 0.02
4% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 45%
USB DISK 2.0 4GB
1GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
3.06% Terrible
Read 10.8
Write 3.04
Mixed 4.02
6% 5.95 MB/s
4K Read 3.47
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.002
13% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.06%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
25.6% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 8.1
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 3.7
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback