Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics62% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive6.04% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '18 at 11:26
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$67
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 190
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 544
54% 439 Pts
64-Core 533
33% 533 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62% Good
Lighting 78.3
Reflection 77
Parallax 68
64% 74.4 fps
MRender 73.6
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 70
58% 71.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Richdisk device 38GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
6.04% Terrible
Read 32.8
Write 48.6
Mixed 36.4
9% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.91
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.64
6% 1.85 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.04%
Great: 21%
Richdisk device 644GB
89GB free
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.6% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 38.2
Mixed 29.3
24% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 2.39
4K Mixed 0.92
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 26%
Richdisk device 199GB
16GB free
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.8% Poor
Read 40.8
Write 52.8
Mixed 23.7
29% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.16
4K Write 6.26
4K Mixed 0.57
394% 4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
43% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 13.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 11.3
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback