Acer Aspire E1-571G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-571G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HC_CR
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130117
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 04 '18 at 20:44
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 161
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 401
41% 331 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 064B) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.86% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 5.62
Parallax 2.91
4% 4.26 fps
MRender 5.43
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 8.09
5% 5.29 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.86%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 63 72 94 96 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 81.3
Write 64.5
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 75.3
51% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
63% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ20UF8BDU0-GN-F HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.3
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.8
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-571G Builds (Compare 465 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-571G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback