Today's hottest deals

Samsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemSamsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411
Memory1.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110615
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateJul 06 '18 at 11:32
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
44.2% Average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 59.9
2-Core 97.2
46% 73.5 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 146
20% 146 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C581) 2.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2622
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.63% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.88
Parallax 0.62
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 1.05
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.26
1% 0.94 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.63%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$40
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 60 37 40 66 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 80
Write 76
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 54.8
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 50%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
432GB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 26.8
Write 21.5
Mixed 19
SusWrite 21.2
29% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AD73I1B0873EV 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F 6GB
1334, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.5% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 7.9
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 5.9
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411 Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback