Clevo W240EU/W250EUQ/W270EUQ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 10%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemClevo W240EU/W250EUQ/W270EUQ  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO W240EU/W250EUQ/W270EUQ
Memory2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '18 at 22:01
Run Duration702 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2328M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Memory 19.7
1-Core 6.7
2-Core 12
9% 12.8 Pts
4-Core 17.4
8-Core 19.5
2% 18.5 Pts
64-Core 13.6
1% 13.6 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Clevo(1558 0240) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.27% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.15
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.51 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 2.52
2% 1.78 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.27%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 25 18 23 23 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 19.9
Write 50.4
Mixed 35
SusWrite 19.8
23% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
51% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 51%
ST500LM0 00-1EJ162 500GB
135GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 3.3 30 34 14 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Read 25.6
Write 31
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 22.5
35% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KSN-2G Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.93 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 2.2
6% 2 GB/s
Latency 323
12% 323 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W240EU/W250EUQ/W270EUQ Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo W240EU/W250EUQ/W270EUQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback