Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	44.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1045T-$165 5,709 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	Memory 48 1-Core 11.9 2-Core 23.7 21% 27.9 Pts	4-Core 47.5 8-Core 70.7 7% 59.1 Pts	64-Core 71.6 4% 71.6 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1805 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.4% Average	Lighting 30.9 Reflection 37.9 Parallax 124 25% 64.2 fps	MRender 99.5 Gravity 108 Splatting 94 82% 100 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 87%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 149 143 143 140 138 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	Read 331 Write 219 Mixed 224 SusWrite 145 51% 230 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 32.1 4K Mixed 20 67% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 167 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 168 124% 163 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBRL F3-12800CL9-4GBSR2 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL F3-12800CL9-4GBSR2 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 800, 800, 667, 800 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 4.7 12% 4.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 4.4 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 39%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	16x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	8x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	6x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $358