Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory16.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131230
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 07 '18 at 23:41
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 95.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 198
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 640
64% 523 Pts
64-Core 807
50% 807 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2972) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.7% Average
Lighting 60.8
Reflection 61.2
Parallax 55.3
50% 59.1 fps
MRender 69.9
Gravity 57.9
Splatting 48.7
47% 58.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 89 90 84 87 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 130
Write 131
Mixed 145
SusWrite 89
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 28.3
114% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 13.1
DQ Mixed 1
2% 5 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 61%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
32GB free
Firmware: 1AA01117
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 84 86 85 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 94
Write 86.2
Mixed 49
SusWrite 85
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT12GX3M3A2000C9 5x4GB
5 of 8 slots used
20GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.1% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 25.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,594 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,163
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback