HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory8.8 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 09 '18 at 00:00
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5640
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 66
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 142
53% 91.9 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 426
42% 345 Pts
64-Core 663
41% 663 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
MSI(1462 3419) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1408 MHz, MLim: 2175 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.6.1
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.8% Average
Lighting 58
Reflection 68.8
Parallax 73.1
47% 66.6 fps
MRender 73.8
Gravity 56.7
Splatting 61.3
52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 128GB-$70
66GB free
Firmware: O0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 180 178 181 180 181 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.4% Average
Read 227
Write 177
Mixed 190
SusWrite 180
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 21.4
70% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 145
115% 162 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 90%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 189 182 179 188 185 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.4% Above average
Read 227
Write 207
Mixed 204
SusWrite 185
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 31.1
96% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 197
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 124%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 500GB
413GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 95 96 95 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 89.9
Write 70.2
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 94.9
53% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 53%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 CE M391B5673EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673EH1-CH9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 CE M391B5673EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673EH1-CH9 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.5% Average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 16.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback