Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 429143M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 429143M  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 429143M
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '18 at 11:15
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 85.5
1-Core 81.6
2-Core 122
61% 96.3 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 201
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21DA) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.22% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 3.65
Parallax 1.66
2% 2.58 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.57
3% 3.09 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.22%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF128GMCS 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FSTAN103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 108 72 72 67 61 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.7% Average
Read 223
Write 197
Mixed 206
SusWrite 88.7
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 19.8
61% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 170
132% 180 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 84%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 133 132 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 125
Write 131
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 133
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
169% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 74%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G4M1 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 16
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $71
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback