Today's hottest deals

MSI Z68A-GD65 (G3) (MS-7681)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics36.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
9 years ago, 9 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7681
MotherboardMSI Z68A-GD65 (G3) (MS-7681)  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '14 at 15:47
Run Duration356 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$70
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 105
2-Core 190
68% 147 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 416
56% 419 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 54% Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
MSI(1462 2775) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.301.1001.0
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Lighting 46.8
Reflection 32.4
Parallax 63.8
38% 47.7 fps
MRender 31.3
Gravity 50.7
Splatting 41.1
34% 41.1 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme II 120GB-$130
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1311 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 421
Write 284
Mixed 288
73% 331 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 20.4
84% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 58.6
98% 190 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 101%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
777GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 78.6
Write 70.3
Mixed 67.5
54% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.16
59% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 67%
Adata DashDrive Elite S102 Pro USB 3.0 32GB-$11
18GB free, PID 312b
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 109
Write 15.4
Mixed 42.3
55% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.37
4K Write 0.46
4K Mixed 0.69
55% 1.84 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 39%
CENTON DS Pro 8GB
7GB free, PID 0000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
2.93% Terrible
Read 11.3
Write 4.67
Mixed 6.3
8% 7.43 MB/s
4K Read 0.99
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.006
4% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.93%
Great: 9%
Typical Z68A-GD65 (G3) (MS-7681) Builds (Compare 173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI Z68A-GD65 (G3) (MS-7681)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $596
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback