Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) 28,018 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	34.9% Below average	Memory 62.2 1-Core 15 2-Core 34.7 28% 37.3 Pts	4-Core 46.8 8-Core 50.1 6% 48.4 Pts	64-Core 55.2 3% 55.2 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 40,685 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 108A) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.5 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	1.1% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 1.81 Parallax 2.03 1% 1.64 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 1.5 Splatting 2.09 2% 1.86 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.1% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-CE256 256GB 1,018 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: TC81202 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 310 Write 266 Mixed 254 62% 277 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 18.2 4K Mixed 16.8 50% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 113 88% 122 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AM1L16BC4R1-B1WS 2x4GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 4.2 13% 4.53 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 4.8 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 7,644 samples	66x
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	57x
Radeon R4AMDBench 2%, 19,746 samples	31x

SSD
RBUSC180DS37256GH 256GBKingstonBench 61%, 337 samples	11x
CV3-CE256 256GBLiteonBench 74%, 1,018 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
AO1L16BC4R1-BQSS 1x4GBAdataBench 20%, 3,685 samples	27x
ACR16D3LS1KBGR/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 2,224 samples	19x
HMT41GS6DFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 27%, 6,821 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16