Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics67.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '18 at 13:40
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-4640 0
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 150
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 497
48% 393 Pts
64-Core 712
44% 712 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2202 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.3% Good
Lighting 84.4
Reflection 83.6
Parallax 81.2
69% 83.1 fps
MRender 78.5
Gravity 76.9
Splatting 80.1
64% 78.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0922A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 160 90 64 54 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 353
Write 305
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 111
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 2.4
43% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 1.2
54% 130 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 99%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
383GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 100 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 100
Write 70
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 102
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB RMR1870EC58E9F133 RMR1870EC58E9F133 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.4% Excellent
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 31.9
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 10.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV FORMULA Builds (Compare 580 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA - $714

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback