Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Wistron Liberty

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Wistron Liberty (all builds)
Motherboard	Wistron Liberty
Memory	8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110725
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '18 at 13:38
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5650 13,757 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 75.8 2-Core 150 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 426 44% 353 Pts	64-Core 492 30% 492 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% EVGA(3842 2670) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.2% Poor	Lighting 25.6 Reflection 29.7 Parallax 41.4 21% 32.2 fps	MRender 38.7 Gravity 34.6 Splatting 30 28% 34.4 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$58 18,195 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 90GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 219 219 222 223 223 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.8% Good	Read 248 Write 236 Mixed 224 SusWrite 221 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 52.6 4K Mixed 30.2 97% 34.4 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 196 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 119%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 12 10 11 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$64 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 903GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 170 170 172 171 172 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 161 Mixed 86.5 SusWrite 171 107% 146 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 3x4GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 3 of 12 slots used 12GB DIMM 1333 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.2% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 19.8 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 10.7 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback