Today's hottest deals

Hitachi HA8000/RS220

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHitachi HA8000/RS220  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte 7TTSHEa
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110224
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJul 21 '18 at 13:59
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5660
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 66.3
2-Core 138
59% 96.9 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 485
49% 397 Pts
64-Core 1,036
64% 1,036 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MR9266-8i 525GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 246 237 207 209 156 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 284
Write 431
Mixed 348
SusWrite 223
73% 321 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 30.6
96% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 240
179% 240 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 90%
Dell PERC 6/E Adapter 26TB
12TB free
Firmware: 1.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 78 82 98 94 86 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.5% Below average
Read 39.6
Write 15.6
Mixed 68.4
SusWrite 81.7
12% 51.3 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 22.3
4K Mixed 26.4
85% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 92.8
DQ Mixed 99.1
74% 97.8 MB/s
Asmt ASM1352R-Fast 16TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 184 197 190 186 188 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 331
Write 218
Mixed 93.8
SusWrite 188
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 3.1
25% 7.83 MB/s
DQ Read 55.4
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 2.5
10% 22.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 64%
Asmt ASM1352R-PM 4TB
808GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 19 15 26 28 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 18.6
Write 80.5
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 23.5
28% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 119%
Asmt ASM1352R-PM 500GB
234GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 56 54 57 55 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 94.2
Write 72.3
Mixed 41.8
SusWrite 54.7
48% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 12 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.4% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 12.3
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.6
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback