Gateway DT55

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGateway DT55  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway DT55
Memory12.4 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '18 at 11:37
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 260
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 46.8
2-Core 95.7
48% 74.5 Pts
4-Core 90.9
8-Core 93.4
12% 92.2 Pts
64-Core 90.9
6% 90.9 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4250
Acer(1025 0444) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
0.61% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.86 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.17
Splatting 1.26
1% 0.78 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.61%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$23
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 48 62 79 70 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 105
Write 54.6
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 61
52% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20
210GB free
Firmware: JP1OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 52 66 79 71 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 5.8
Write 47.5
Mixed 8
SusWrite 63.9
23% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.5% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.6
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DT55 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Gateway DT55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback