PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 93% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130715 |
Uptime | 4.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 29 '18 at 23:15 |
Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.4%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.7.1
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.8%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 126 121 122 121 122 MB/s
|
93%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
93GB free
Firmware: SD04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 87 89 90 90 87 MB/s
|
44.9%
Average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA 2TB
811GB free
Firmware: ML6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
|
17.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$31
271GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 78 79 80 80 MB/s
|
53.1%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
|
44%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $85Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 578x |
FX-8320AMD $153Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 213x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 111x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $120Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 76x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 66x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 61x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $385 |