HP ProBook 650 G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 650 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1993
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180412
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 30 '18 at 17:10
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 54.7
2-Core 109
49% 78.5 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 455
37% 323 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 1993) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 6.04
Parallax 4.66
3% 4.66 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 1.97
Splatting 7.13
4% 4.24 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 1TB (TurboPC EX)
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 328 344 270 300 299 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64% Good
Read 485
Write 313
Mixed 294
SusWrite 310
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 19.2
75% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 80.2
DQ Write 50.4
DQ Mixed 47
40% 59.2 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64%
Great: 126%
Samsung Portable SSD T3 1TB
491GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 223 243 191 191 197 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.7% Below average
Read 216
Write 193
Mixed 173
SusWrite 212
45% 199 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 11.7
38% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 71.5
DQ Write 75.1
DQ Mixed 50.1
44% 65.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 7.6
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 650 G1 Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 650 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback