| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H87M-PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130407 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 02 '18 at 20:36 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 87% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.4%
Good
|
64% 110 Pts
|
35% 264 Pts
|
21% 335 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
14.8%
Very poor
|
15% 16.6 fps
|
15% 19 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 100 107 110 116 113 MB/s
|
58.7%
Above average
|
63% 86.1 MB/s
|
123% 0.83 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate ST3500410AS 500GB
397GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 108 109 109 118 115 MB/s
|
62.4%
Good
|
71% 97.2 MB/s
|
170% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
TOSHIBA STOR.E EDITION 1TB
420GB free, PID 0b1f
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 22 23 23 MB/s
|
9.12%
Terrible
|
27% 20.3 MB/s
|
25% 0.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
44.8%
Average
|
45% 15.9 GB/s
|
33% 11.5 GB/s
|
47% 85.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H87M-PLUS Builds (Compare 607 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H87M-PLUS - $128
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 132x |
| Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 96x |
| Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples | 58x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 57x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 46x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 35x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $246 |