HP t630 Thin Client

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP t630 Thin Client  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8158
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180510
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 21 '18 at 10:42
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Memory 61.1
1-Core 38.5
2-Core 42.1
34% 47.2 Pts
4-Core 93.9
8-Core 94.3
13% 94.1 Pts
64-Core 94.3
6% 94.3 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7E Graphics
HP(103C 8158) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
1.27% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 4.27
Parallax 3.97
0% 2.76 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 5.48
4% 4.39 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.27%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 99 97 92 92 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 418
Write 313
Mixed 210
SusWrite 99.6
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 33.7
117% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 176
141% 198 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.1% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 13
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical t630 Thin Client Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP t630 Thin Client

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback