Samsung

M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB

M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB
BENCHMARKS (54,777)
MKT (0.1%)
BUILDS
(1)

Effective Speed -49%Effective Speed -49%Average Score -53%MC Read -52%, MC Write -53%, MC Mixed -55%Peak Score -63%MC Read -62%, MC Write -60%, MC Mixed -66%Value & Sentiment -65%User Rating -12%, Market Share -118%Nice To Haves -21%SC Read -33%, SC Write -20%, SC Mixed -37%, SC Read -28%, SC Write -17%, SC Mixed -40%, Latency -57%, Latency -15%, Age 59%

Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB

Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB

Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB

Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB

Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB

Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

Average Bench: 60.2% (88^th of 115)

Based on 54,777 user benchmarks. Model: Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB

Poor: 27%Average: 60.2% Great: 74%

Popular builds with this RAM

Above average average bench

The Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB averaged 39.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 23.3GB/s

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 23GB/s

See where your RAM ranks →

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB is 47%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 115ns

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 14.6GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 54,777 samples)

Rank 8860.2%

Min	Avg	Max
7.8	MC Read 23	29.2
7.4	MC Write 21.7	28.3
13	MC Mixed 19.4	24.4
61.1% 21.4 GB/s

Min	Avg	Max
6.53	SC Read 14.6	21
7.25	SC Write 23.3	34.1
9.32	SC Mixed 18.5	23.9
53.8% 18.8 GB/s

Min	Avg	Max
63.2	Latency 115	238
34.9% 115 ns

User Benchmarks

Bench

Multi core

Single core

Latency

The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%

IND-User, 4 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz

61.3% Good

MC Read 20.8

MC Write 24.4

MC Mixed 20

62% 21.7 GB/s

SC Read 12.9

SC Write 23.9

SC Mixed 16.6

51% 17.8 GB/s

Latency 77.8

51% 77.8 ns

NLD-User, 6 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz

58% Above average

MC Read 21.8

MC Write 21

MC Mixed 17.2

57% 20 GB/s

SC Read 14.9

SC Write 25.3

SC Mixed 21

58% 20.4 GB/s

Latency 94.2

42% 94.2 ns

IDN-User, 8 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz

56.4% Above average

MC Read 22.1

MC Write 17.8

MC Mixed 20.8

58% 20.2 GB/s

SC Read 17.2

SC Write 19.7

SC Mixed 19.9

54% 18.9 GB/s

Latency 165

24% 165 ns

ECU-User, 9 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz

55.6% Above average

MC Read 22.9

MC Write 20.5

MC Mixed 21

61% 21.5 GB/s

SC Read 10.2

SC Write 12.8

SC Mixed 14.7

36% 12.6 GB/s

Latency 245

16% 245 ns

ESP-User, 4 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz

52.8% Above average

MC Read 21.1

MC Write 19.7

MC Mixed 19

57% 19.9 GB/s

SC Read 9.6

SC Write 13.9

SC Mixed 14.9

37% 12.8 GB/s

Latency 168

24% 168 ns

USA-User, 8 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz

51.5% Above average

MC Read 19.5

MC Write 21.2

MC Mixed 19.2

57% 20 GB/s

SC Read 8.3

SC Write 11.6

SC Mixed 10.8

29% 10.2 GB/s

Latency 184

22% 184 ns

DNK-User, 5 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz

46.6% Average

MC Read 19.1

MC Write 16.9

MC Mixed 14

48% 16.7 GB/s

SC Read 11.6

SC Write 15.7

SC Mixed 11.8

37% 13 GB/s

Latency 106

38% 106 ns

USA-User, 11 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz

27.6% Poor

MC Read 10.2

MC Write 11.2

MC Mixed 9.3

29% 10.2 GB/s

SC Read 5.1

SC Write 10.3

SC Mixed 6.6

21% 7.33 GB/s

Latency 295

14% 295 ns

EGY-User, 13 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz

19.5% Very poor

MC Read 6.9

MC Write 9

MC Mixed 6.9

22% 7.6 GB/s

SC Read 1.8

SC Write 4

SC Mixed 3.4

9% 3.07 GB/s

Latency 323

12% 323 ns

54,777 MORE »

Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 61,255,174 RAM Kits tested.

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB Builds (Compare 3,251 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	2,217x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	921x
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	81x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,707x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	773x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	594x

SSD
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	274x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $44Bench 177%, 99,566 samples	181x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples	147x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	508x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark.
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- See speed test results from other users.
- Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2023 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. ^[RAMPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

Comments

Added n/a ago.

USA-User

level
9,404

Average (edit your comment) Add link

17 months ago.

Your
opinion?

▲Like ▼Dislike

Ready to retire
Age: 5 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ

What is the UBM value for money rating?

What is UBM Effective Speed?

Thunderbolt speed?

Are USB 3.0 cables different?

USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?

Why buy USB 3.0 today?

USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?

Graphics Cards

How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?

What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?

What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?

What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?

Memory Kits

What is the RAM value for money rating?

What is the effective RAM speed index?

What is the system memory latency ladder?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $300	Nvidia RTX 3060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $25
Intel Core i5-12600K $224	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $300	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $86
Intel Core i5-12400F $150	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $780	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Samsung

M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB

Average Bench: 60.2% (88th of 115)

Popular builds with this RAM

Above average average bench

Strengths

Average consistency

Weaknesses

Average Bench

Market Share (See Leaders)

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx

Popular M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB systems:

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Group Test Results

Share a related link

Comments

Average (edit your comment) Add link

Speed Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback

Average Bench: 60.2% (88^th of 115)