Capital Neo

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCapital Neo  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67OW
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '19 at 19:57
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
SKTH, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 145
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 208
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Zotac(19DA 1665) 1GB
CLim: 820 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 15.7
14% 18 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 17.9
Splatting 20.1
17% 21 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SV100S2128G 128GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 120504
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 124 145 152 182 202 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 224
Write 159
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 157
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 15.9
4K Mixed 5.2
22% 8.67 MB/s
DQ Read 11.8
DQ Write 23.7
DQ Mixed 15.4
12% 17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 37%
Hitachi HTS725050A9A366 500GB
458GB free
Firmware: PC4OC70E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 105 106 105 105 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60% Good
Read 106
Write 106
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 103
67% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60%
Great: 60%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
4GB free, PID 5151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
5.65% Terrible
Read 21.8
Write 5.3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 5.7
10% 9.27 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.65%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLN-2G Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 JM1333KLN-2G Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.1% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Neo Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Capital Neo

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $58
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback