PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 28.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7693 |
Motherboard | MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693) (all builds) |
Memory | 10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 2715 x 1527 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20141216 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Feb 24 '19 at 16:02 |
Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
Run User | AUT-User |
Background CPU | 24% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
61.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2242 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.17
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42%
Average
|
|||
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
Asus(1043 845B) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.17
|
15.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk S128G 126GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 119 91 46 32 24 MB/s
|
28.1%
Poor
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$61
59GB free
Firmware: X61110RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 251 150 133 129 116 MB/s
|
70.8%
Very good
|
|||
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
532GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 112 114 116 115 114 MB/s
|
61.7%
Good
|
|||
asmedia ASM1053 2TB
1TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
|
14.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.9%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 960x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 412x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 264x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 166x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 149x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 141x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $289 |