bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive23.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DH67BL
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110523
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 23 '19 at 20:21
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$191
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 86
2-Core 155
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 312
36% 282 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Relative performance (0th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 14.5
12% 14.4 fps
MRender 19.3
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 13.9
13% 16.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 206 52 92 56 75 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.2% Poor
Read 196
Write 177
Mixed 181
SusWrite 111
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.5
32% 8.53 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
148GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 92 91 91 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 108
Mixed 60
SusWrite 90.2
65% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 69%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
11GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 5.8 5.7 5.6 5.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
5.72% Terrible
Read 25
Write 4.3
Mixed 14
SusWrite 5.7
14% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.8
40% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.72%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.2% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.5
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 12.8
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback