Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds)
Memory	17.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170607
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '19 at 21:14
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	50%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.35 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 73.5 2-Core 138 60% 98.4 Pts	4-Core 255 8-Core 385 40% 320 Pts	64-Core 438 27% 438 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.1% Above average	Lighting 47.4 Reflection 54.7 Parallax 94.7 39% 65.6 fps	MRender 92.8 Gravity 88.8 Splatting 93.5 75% 91.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 142 143 109 63 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	39% Below average	Read 421 Write 141 Mixed 194 SusWrite 109 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 4 56% 13.1 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 134%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 367GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 17 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 32.2 Write 17.5 Mixed 15.8 SusWrite 17.6 15% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 32% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 992069 (997069) 4x8GB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.9% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 14.1 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 12.2 30% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 95%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	51x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	13x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	13x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $588

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16