Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3340M 20 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Micro-FCBGA, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 88.5 1-Core 93.4 2-Core 154 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 224 30% 223 Pts	64-Core 223 14% 223 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 6005) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	4.13% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 6 Parallax 3.16 4% 4.59 fps	MRender 5.38 Gravity 2.57 Splatting 8.74 5% 5.56 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.13% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 22,748 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 445 Write 307 Mixed 320 79% 357 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 43.2 4K Mixed 24.3 91% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 53.2 DQ Mixed 42.7 59% 115 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 94%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2012)-$45 601 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 73GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 54 57 60 59 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Read 58.9 Write 58 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 56.2 38% 51.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CK0 Hynix HMT325S6EFR8C-PB 4GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 16.9 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 16.1 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Core i5-3340MIntelBench 56%, 20 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	2x

RAM
SNY1600S11-2G-EDEG 0707 GU6C2303EP0200 4GBKingstonBench 47%, 1 sample	1x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 8GBSamsungBench 49%, 50 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16