Asus P9X79 DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P9X79 DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	56 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140507
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 22 '20 at 22:22
Run Duration	254 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	46%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 53 2-Core 178 60% 105 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 494 52% 417 Pts	64-Core 734 45% 734 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.4% Above average	Lighting 68.5 Reflection 73 Parallax 70.5 56% 70.7 fps	MRender 66.5 Gravity 67 Splatting 66.3 54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$89 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 222GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 399 394 406 388 401 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 466 Write 440 Mixed 386 SusWrite 394 95% 421 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 75.7 4K Mixed 37.8 145% 50.2 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 346 264% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 133%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$146 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 453GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 70 70 71 69 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 446 Write 294 Mixed 350 SusWrite 71.2 65% 290 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 22.2 4K Mixed 22.1 82% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 56.6 DQ Mixed 92.6 83% 132 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 125%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 105GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 332 249 246 233 238 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	74% Very good	Read 466 Write 380 Mixed 324 SusWrite 276 81% 362 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 18.7 4K Mixed 24.3 96% 26.4 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 37.6 DQ Mixed 80.6 92% 168 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 134%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 291GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 145 122 134 108 132 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 103 Write 110 Mixed 61.7 SusWrite 127 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.9 193% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 112%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71 7,245 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 551GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 70 72 69 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 108 Write 104 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 70 63% 86 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 269% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 107%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 142GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 77 73 77 74 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	46% Average	Read 84.7 Write 89.7 Mixed 89.5 SusWrite 75.2 63% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 76%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 253GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 70 69 71 69 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 124 Write 114 Mixed 101 SusWrite 69.2 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR3 1600 2OZ DDR3 1600 DDR3 1600 DDR3 1600 DDR3 1600 2OZ DDR3 1600 DDR3 1600 DDR3 1600 64GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.8% Very good	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 35.9 MC Mixed 30.7 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 10.4 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9X79 DELUXE Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 DELUXE - $500

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	254x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	162x
Core i7-3960XIntel $265Bench 78%, 2,165 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	35x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	32x
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples	31x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	29x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	26x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	16x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	19x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	11x
DDR3 1600G DDR3 1600G Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 12GBAdataBench 52%, 28 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,060

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16