Asus Commando

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Commando  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070417
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 30 '20 at 23:19
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6700-$230
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27% Poor
Memory 49
1-Core 30.5
2-Core 56.6
30% 45.4 Pts
4-Core 29.7
8-Core 47.7
5% 38.7 Pts
64-Core 40.6
2% 40.6 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300
Sapphire(174B 1341) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.18% Terrible
Lighting 1.57
Reflection 2.54
Parallax 1.28
1% 1.8 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.43
1% 1.19 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.18%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$16
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 47 42 54 53 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 83.5
Write 82.7
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 48.4
47% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 60%
Seagate ST3500841AS 500GB
399GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 48 46 55 54 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 56.2
Write 25.6
Mixed 33
SusWrite 50.2
30% 41.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 34%
Seagate ST3500830AS 500GB-$145
465GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 67 77 77 77 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 70.2
Write 42.7
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 74.8
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 44%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
105GB free, PID 0673
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 16.5
Write 14
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 25.8
27% 19 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.28% Terrible
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 2.6
9% 3.1 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 1
SC Mixed 1.1
3% 1 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 9.28%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Commando Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus Commando

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $300
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback