Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	4.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199 39,605 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	25.3% Poor	Memory 18 1-Core 45.1 2-Core 86.6 26% 49.9 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 332 30% 253 Pts	64-Core 306 19% 306 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 555M 4,170 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Dell(1028 04B7) 3GB CLim: 590 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	4.25% Terrible	Lighting 4.7 Reflection 7.9 Parallax 1.1 4% 4.57 fps	MRender 7.7 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 5.5 5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.25% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB 11,312 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 070H SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 107 98 64 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 318 Write 154 Mixed 176 SusWrite 91.1 41% 185 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 41.6 4K Mixed 11.9 64% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 29.4 45% 85.6 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 8GB 358 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	20.8% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 7.8 23% 8.1 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 336 12% 336 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	242x
GeForce GT 555MNvidiaBench 4%, 4,170 samples	236x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	85x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	67x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	38x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	23x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $280

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16