TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hynix

HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≤ Q4 2015.

VS

Average Bench: 43.9% (95th of 108)

Based on 3,543 user benchmarks.  Model: Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB
Poor: 23%Average: 43.9% Great: 51%

Popular builds with this RAM

Below average average bench

The Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB averaged 56.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 87.9ns
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 15.7GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB is 28.9%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 11.4GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 11.8GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 3,543 samples)
Rank 9543.9%
Min Avg Max
7.4 MC Read 15.7 18.4
6.19 MC Write 15.7 18.7
8.99 MC Mixed 14.6 16.6
43.8% 15.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
4.79 SC Read 11.4 14.9
4.1 SC Write 11.8 16.6
4.89 SC Mixed 12.4 16.6
33.9% 11.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
69 Latency 87.9 144
45.5% 87.9 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
52.3% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
49.4% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 13.5
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
48.8% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 12.4
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
48% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 12.3
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
47.7% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
47% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
46.7% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 14.4
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
28.2% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.9
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
3,543 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 18,015,098 RAM Kits tested.

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB Builds (Compare 5,087 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Dell Latitude E6420

CPU
Core i5-2520MIntel  $151Bench 38%, 25,131 samples2,307x
Core i7-2620MIntelBench 40%, 8,144 samples580x
Core i5-2540MIntel  $293Bench 40%, 8,787 samples558x
GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 65,231 samples3,712x
NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 4,001 samples1,025x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 107,861 samples295x
SSD
PM830 128GBSamsungBench 61%, 5,513 samples78x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $104Bench 106%, 446,313 samples74x
A400 240GBKingston  $30Bench 65%, 63,490 samples58x
RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 44%, 3,543 samples216x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $151

Popular HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop Workstation

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2019 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 3 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB

108 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $248Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $728SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Test your PC Build a PC
Can You Run It?
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback