Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170509
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	May 18 '17 at 06:09
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 65.7 1-Core 96.8 2-Core 195 66% 119 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 652 62% 515 Pts	64-Core 1024 63% 1024 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140 15,701 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 845B) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.9 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Lighting 21.4 Reflection 19.4 Parallax 27.4 18% 22.8 fps	MRender 28 Gravity 19.2 Splatting 22.9 19% 23.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 20504568 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 33217277074174 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1260 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 215 (B1) Unknown 0 0 98 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 35 45 51542556707 (C2) HDA temperature 35 45 51542556707 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 20504568 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 20504568 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 20504568 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 13884 (EA) Unknown 0 0 11108 (F1) Unknown 0 0 11108 (F2) Unknown 0 0 13291	70.9% Very good	Read 503 Write 214 Mixed 292 74% 336 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 73.5 4K Mixed 13.2 101% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 12.7 61% 139 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 94%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20 41,230 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 143GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 198 (03) Spinup time 135 131 4208 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5736 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10935 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1924 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 786 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5736 (C2) HDA temperature 101 97 42 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 198 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 198 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 199 0	39.1% Below average	Read 63 Write 72.9 Mixed 65.4 50% 67.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.36 92% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 55%
Hitachi HDS725050KLA360 500GB-$40 5,497 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 64GB free Firmware: K2AOAD1A Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 108 108 55877173893 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 12696 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 33093 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2442 (C0) Power-off retract count 89 89 13878 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 13878 (C2) HDA temperature 122 122 249108824109 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0	26.3% Poor	Read 52.4 Write 39.2 Mixed 37.6 32% 43.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.07 4K Mixed 0.27 63% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2400 1x16GB 328 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.3% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 11.1 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 13.2 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CROSSHAIR VI HERO Builds (Compare 1,750 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 92%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $227

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	277x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	206x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	191x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	193x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	156x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	116x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	88x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	60x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	53x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	69x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	45x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $855

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16