Average Bench: 93.1% (15th of 115)

Based on 89,024 user benchmarks.  Model: Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 4x8GB

Excellent average bench

The Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB averaged just 6.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 37.3GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 32.3GB/s

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB is 52.6%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 73.4ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 23.9GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 89,024 samples)
Min Avg Max
25.8 MC Read 37.3 54.3
17.7 MC Write 30.8 42.4
22.4 MC Mixed 32.3 40.4
95.6% 33.5 GB/s
Min Avg Max
15.1 SC Read 23.9 31.8
16.2 SC Write 29.8 45.8
20.8 SC Mixed 30.8 39.8
80.5% 28.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
54 Latency 73.4 104
54.5% 73.4 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 36
111% 39 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 44.3
SC Mixed 36
103% 36.1 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.4
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 31.3
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 38.5
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.8
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 38.4
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 32.4
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 31.6
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 25.3
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 24.3
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.8
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 26.5
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 25.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 26.4
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
89,024 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,218,923 RAM Kits tested

Typical Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB Builds (Compare 23,447 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $587

Popular Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Excellent

3 years ago.

bought these when I first built this pc, had no idea what xmp was. all these years later this is still a great kit at a great price. 4x8gb works fine at 3200 or even 3466 with tuned timings, just remember to shove voltage in it


Your
opinion?
115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback