Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 04 '17 at 01:22
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 980
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 51.5
2-Core 103
52% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 192
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7970-$435
XFX(1682 3212) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.0.0
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 30
Parallax 32.2
12% 25.8 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 46.2
Splatting 37.5
31% 37.3 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 486
Write 329
Mixed 338
85% 384 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 23.4
128% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 50.6
78% 150 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
561GB free
Firmware: SBM3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
66% Good
Read 120
Write 110
Mixed 78.2
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 3.99
4K Mixed 0.34
144% 1.71 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 66%
Great: 70%
TEAM USB Disk 8GB
3GB free, PID 0902
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 51.3
Write 16.6
Mixed 14.2
28% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 8.74
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.02
33% 2.92 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.9% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 11.2
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback