Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200619
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 27 '21 at 12:48
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	18%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 81.5 1-Core 119 2-Core 197 76% 132 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 395 44% 348 Pts	64-Core 512 32% 512 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Asus(1043 10C1) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2546 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	Lighting 31.6 Reflection 31 Parallax 31.9 26% 31.5 fps	MRender 35.4 Gravity 34.4 Splatting 20.8 24% 30.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PP3-8D128 128GB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: LTNFW1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 178 84 82 82 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Read 474 Write 326 Mixed 372 SusWrite 102 71% 319 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 44.7 4K Mixed 17.2 79% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 134 103% 141 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 115%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 572GB free Firmware: SDM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 116 114 113 115 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 69.3 Write 93 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 114 63% 85 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.6 182% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK Kingston 9905704-008.A00G 8GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	64.8% Good	MC Read 23.6 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 18.5 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 30.1 SC Mixed 21.8 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 77.8 51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,616 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	1,695x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	921x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,558x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,057x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	325x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	120x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	109x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	877x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	220x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	80x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16