Hynix

HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB

HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB
BENCHMARKS (72,768)
MKT (0.1%)
BUILDS
(2)

Effective Speed -123%Effective Speed -123%Average Score -143%MC Read -125%, MC Write -140%, MC Mixed -166%Peak Score -181%MC Read -163%, MC Write -176%, MC Mixed -203%Value & Sentiment -122%User Rating -12%, Market Share -231%Nice To Haves -65%SC Read -69%, SC Write -108%, SC Mixed -110%, SC Read -79%, SC Write -122%, SC Mixed -123%, Latency -25%, Latency -11%, Age 59%

Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB

Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB

Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB

Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB

Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB

Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

Average Bench: 40% (105^th of 113)

Based on 72,768 user benchmarks. Model: Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB

Poor: 25%Average: 40% Great: 46%

Popular builds with this RAM

Below average average bench

The Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB averaged 59.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 15.5GB/s

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 92.5ns

See where your RAM ranks →

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB is 21.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 11.3GB/s

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 11.4GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 72,768 samples)

Rank 10540%

Min	Avg	Max
9.7	MC Read 15.5	17.9
7.9	MC Write 13.8	16.4
8.32	MC Mixed 11.3	13.5
38.7% 13.5 GB/s

Min	Avg	Max
5.4	SC Read 11.4	14.9
6.47	SC Write 13.4	18
6	SC Mixed 12	15.1
35.1% 12.3 GB/s

Min	Avg	Max
60.9	Latency 92.5	180
43.2% 92.5 ns

User Benchmarks

Bench

Multi core

Single core

Latency

The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%

FRA-User, 4 hrs ago.

1 of 2 slots used

8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz

45.4% Average

MC Read 17.4

MC Write 15.2

MC Mixed 11.9

42% 14.8 GB/s

SC Read 13.8

SC Write 16.4

SC Mixed 14.2

42% 14.8 GB/s

Latency 61

66% 61 ns

GBR-User, 5 hrs ago.

1 of 2 slots used

8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz

45% Average

MC Read 17.5

MC Write 16.2

MC Mixed 12.1

44% 15.3 GB/s

SC Read 12.2

SC Write 15.1

SC Mixed 13

38% 13.4 GB/s

Latency 72.2

55% 72.2 ns

ARG-User, 9 hrs ago.

1 of 2 slots used

8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz

43% Average

MC Read 16.4

MC Write 15.4

MC Mixed 11.2

41% 14.3 GB/s

SC Read 13.3

SC Write 16.6

SC Mixed 13.9

42% 14.6 GB/s

Latency 80.5

50% 80.5 ns

NLD-User, 27 mins ago.

1 of 2 slots used

8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz

41.4% Average

MC Read 15.5

MC Write 14.6

MC Mixed 10.9

39% 13.7 GB/s

SC Read 12.8

SC Write 15.5

SC Mixed 9.9

36% 12.7 GB/s

Latency 66.2

60% 66.2 ns

PRT-User, 59 mins ago.

1 of 2 slots used

8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz

39.8% Below average

MC Read 15.4

MC Write 13.3

MC Mixed 11.5

38% 13.4 GB/s

SC Read 12.8

SC Write 12.7

SC Mixed 12.3

36% 12.6 GB/s

Latency 83.2

48% 83.2 ns

PAK-User, 48 mins ago.

1 of 2 slots used

8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz

39.5% Below average

MC Read 14.6

MC Write 13.9

MC Mixed 11

38% 13.2 GB/s

SC Read 11.6

SC Write 13.8

SC Mixed 12.4

36% 12.6 GB/s

Latency 77.7

52% 77.7 ns

IDN-User, 2 hrs ago.

1 of 2 slots used

8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz

34.1% Below average

MC Read 13.2

MC Write 11.5

MC Mixed 10.2

33% 11.6 GB/s

SC Read 8.1

SC Write 9

SC Mixed 10.1

26% 9.07 GB/s

Latency 84.8

47% 84.8 ns

GBR-User, 2 hrs ago.

1 of 2 slots used

8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz

34% Below average

MC Read 13.8

MC Write 10.8

MC Mixed 8.9

32% 11.2 GB/s

SC Read 10.3

SC Write 13.4

SC Mixed 9.4

32% 11 GB/s

Latency 84.6

47% 84.6 ns

USA-User, 4 hrs ago.

1 of 2 slots used

8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz

21.6% Poor

MC Read 7.5

MC Write 6.9

MC Mixed 7.1

20% 7.17 GB/s

SC Read 4.9

SC Write 7.2

SC Mixed 7.2

18% 6.43 GB/s

Latency 124

32% 124 ns

72,768 MORE »

Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 52,932,102 RAM Kits tested.

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB Builds (Compare 5,710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 72%, 159,985 samples	3,753x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 75%, 386,779 samples	1,957x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 466,129 samples	3,255x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 25%, 160,021 samples	2,455x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 82%, 17,675 samples	884x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 95%, 17,424 samples	261x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 74%, 53,642 samples	239x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 72,768 samples	2,530x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchMark.
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- See speed test results from other users.
- Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2022 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. ^[RAMPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

Comments

Added n/a ago.

USA-User

level
8,768

Liked (edit your comment) Add link

2 years ago.

w7gmc

level
2

Poor

12 months ago.

slow

Your
opinion?

▲Like ▼Dislike

Ready to retire
Age: 4 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

113 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ

What is the UBM value for money rating?

What is UBM Effective Speed?

Thunderbolt speed?

Are USB 3.0 cables different?

USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?

Why buy USB 3.0 today?

USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?

Graphics Cards

How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?

What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?

What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?

What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?

Memory Kits

What is the RAM value for money rating?

What is the effective RAM speed index?

What is the system memory latency ladder?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $280	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $168	Nvidia RTX 3050 $250	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $109
Intel Core i7-12700K $380	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $33	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Hynix

HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB

Average Bench: 40% (105th of 113)

Popular builds with this RAM

Below average average bench

Strengths

Good consistency

Weaknesses

Average Bench

Market Share (See Leaders)

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Popular HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB systems:

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Group Test Results

Share a related link

Comments

Liked (edit your comment) Add link

Poor

Speed Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback

Average Bench: 40% (105^th of 113)