Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	65.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160531
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '21 at 09:53
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370-$175 34,720 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 78.7 1-Core 68.5 2-Core 130 56% 92.2 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 312 34% 270 Pts	64-Core 336 21% 336 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Gigabyte(1458 36CC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Lighting 83.8 Reflection 88.3 Parallax 78.3 68% 83.5 fps	MRender 78.7 Gravity 77.8 Splatting 69.6 61% 75.4 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38 83,298 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 236GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 78 72 4.5 5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 388 Write 233 Mixed 285 SusWrite 53 53% 240 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 43.5 4K Mixed 17.9 78% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 26 DQ Write 70.8 DQ Mixed 20.9 24% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 92%
Toshiba Q300 120GB 1,888 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 5GB free Firmware: SAFM12.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 390 Write 372 Mixed 262 76% 341 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 48.5 4K Mixed 27.8 98% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 30 DQ Write 84.2 DQ Mixed 38 34% 50.7 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 87%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 213GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 91 92 86 6.9 6.7 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 88.7 Write 85.8 Mixed 58.8 SusWrite 60.7 54% 73.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL9-10-9 D3-1866 4x4GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	43.4% Average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 14.8 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 10.4 26% 9.13 GB/s	Latency 83 48% 83 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 100%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	193x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	191x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	63x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	53x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	33x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	17x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	27x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $152

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16