Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1024x768x4294967296 szín, 1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150820
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '21 at 20:31
Run Duration	268 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	50%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 78.8 1-Core 88.8 2-Core 176 66% 114 Pts	4-Core 265 8-Core 318 38% 291 Pts	64-Core 314 19% 314 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Palit(1569 1184) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 8.8 Reflection 20.6 Parallax 10.4 7% 13.3 fps	Gravity 0.7 Splatting 9.9 5% 5.3 fps
Poor: 32% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 298 252 175 146 129 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Read 454 Write 309 Mixed 249 SusWrite 215 68% 307 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 72.3 4K Mixed 29.3 124% 44.4 MB/s	DQ Read 309 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 237 196% 280 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 29GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 154 150 140 138 147 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 163 Mixed 84.4 SusWrite 146 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 232% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 109%
WD Ext HDD 1021 2.5TB 317 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 35GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 36 35 35 35 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 33.9 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 35.1 45% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G 16GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	53% Above average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 17.5 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 13.8 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 82.7 48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B85M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,795 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H - $71

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	504x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	497x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	475x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	474x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	227x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	224x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	154x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	115x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	114x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	68x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	58x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	50x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $308

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16