MSI 760GM -E51 (MS-7596)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago.

System	MICRO-STAR MS-7596
Motherboard	MSI 760GM -E51 (MS-7596) (all builds)
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110228
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '22 at 09:30
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	78%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 945 12,746 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Memory 69.9 1-Core 28.3 2-Core 63.4 37% 53.9 Pts	4-Core 77.6 8-Core 130 13% 104 Pts	64-Core 137 8% 137 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 58%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 148GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 64 55 54 58 55 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.8% Poor	Read 130 Write 106 Mixed 121 SusWrite 57.6 23% 104 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 21.8 4K Mixed 13.4 46% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 25.6 DQ Write 57 DQ Mixed 36.2 29% 39.6 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 137%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 409GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 65 55 54 58 55 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	38.2% Below average	Read 75.1 Write 65.2 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 57.7 48% 64.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 59%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68 105,708 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 437GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 80 77 78 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 52.9 Write 62.9 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 80.9 41% 56.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 1.6 291% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM SDRAM Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	23% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 8.9 24% 8.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.7 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 760GM -E51 (MS-7596) Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 760GM -E51 (MS-7596)

CPU
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	6x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	5x
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	4x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	3x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	4x
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	2x
MTS400 M.2 256GBTranscend $145Bench 79%, 1,007 samples	2x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	13x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	4x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $232

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16