Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming K5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming K5  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171130
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 24 '22 at 07:46
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$233
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 85.3
1-Core 137
2-Core 250
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 679
69% 559 Pts
64-Core 718
44% 718 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 187
Parallax 188
134% 180 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 180
Splatting 124
118% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SATA M.2 250GB-$89
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 198 198 194 180 190 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
63% Good
Read 441
Write 412
Mixed 272
SusWrite 195
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 18.8
81% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 182
140% 197 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 63%
Great: 100%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
219GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1112 463 308 307 294 312 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 2000
Write 1,321
Mixed 560
SusWrite 466
240% 1,087 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 35.5
130% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 874
DQ Write 99.7
DQ Mixed 193
216% 389 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 170%
Great: 236%
Asmt 2115 500GB
428GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 151 158 156 148 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 345
Write 316
Mixed 316
SusWrite 154
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 20.3
70% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 88.4
DQ Mixed 155
106% 131 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50%
Great: 76%
JMicron 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 229 233 228 222 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 344
Write 282
Mixed 312
SusWrite 213
65% 288 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 25.1
82% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 76.1
DQ Mixed 142
106% 145 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 61%
Jmicron Generic 500GB
314GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 126 127 129 212 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 373
Write 293
Mixed 247
SusWrite 141
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 21.5
69% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 68.7
DQ Mixed 142
107% 149 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 91%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 157 160 160 154 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 128
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 158
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 91%
Great: 99%
WD Elements SE 25FF 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 25ff
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 107 106 101 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 143
Write 115
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 106
143% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 68%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
879GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 79 79 76 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 97.5
Write 95.7
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 78.4
115% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.1% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 12.6
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming K5 Builds (Compare 1,120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming K5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $567
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback