PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Biostar TZ77B (all builds) |
Memory | 10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120823 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Feb 03 '23 at 01:48 |
Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
63.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53.2%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 260 295 285 285 287 MB/s
|
66.5%
Good
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
219GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 95 101 103 102 102 MB/s
|
56.8%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 04CD F3-10666CL7-4GBXH 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 04CD F3-10666CL7-4GBXH 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 22x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 14x |
Core i5-3550Intel $335Bench 69%, 23,599 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 6x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 5x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $308 |