Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	69.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	66.1% Good	Memory 76.2 1-Core 88.6 2-Core 177 66% 114 Pts	4-Core 303 8-Core 450 47% 376 Pts	64-Core 454 28% 454 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 69%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
FAS Device 256GB M.2 25 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 208GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW201105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 336 336 354 352 350 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Read 419 Write 344 Mixed 325 SusWrite 344 80% 358 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 46.8 4K Mixed 11.4 79% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 167 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 20 69% 148 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 1x16GB 22,543 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	38.8% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 11.6 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 12.7 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 88 46% 88 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	1,562x
Quadro M2000MNvidiaBench 16%, 5,864 samples	585x
Quadro M1000MNvidiaBench 13%, 6,377 samples	401x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	183x
MTFDDAV512TBN-1AR15ABHA 512GBCrucialBench 78%, 710 samples	181x
MZNLN512HMJP-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 101%, 1,400 samples	126x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	210x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	162x
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 40%, 22,543 samples	113x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16